I must say, I was quite disturbed by the article after Layfield read it to us. I was really unsure what to make of it. Once I gave it a good week of thinking I think I finally formed an opinion:
I honestly want to see the formula they use to predict the future and determine whether or not people will be reliable employees. What happened to the ideas where a man could not, under any circumstances, be summed in one word, one setence, one entire paragraph? Is this a sign that we've become so predictable? I'd like to think my mind is my own and I'm in control of being who I want to be.
I remember when, back in grade school, we were constantly told to be an individual and being unpredictable. Was that all just a cover up for things like this or maybe have we messed up in being unpredictable that we've become predictable? I know, a paradox but my mind is on a slant. Leave me be XD So much for being a good student and following instructions. X/
I'm also starting to think that originality and individualism is being shoved out of us. We are no longer meant to be individuals but a unit. A unit of predictable, dull people. We are born and raised to be workers, we have no other purpose than that. That's why a formula like this is becoming so dominant now.
The way this article was written proved to be a good scare tactic though. It might change many who read this to reform into a better personality. It might change them onto a path of 'good' person if they want to continue putting bread on the table for little Lucy and Steven.
That's just a thought though. X3 Don't take it to heart kittens.